In considering word formation in language development, there appear to be two central issues which can broadly be characterized as questions relating to (i) productivity, and (ii) constraints. This paper reviews one of the renowned articles which involving the theory of level-ordering that has three levels within the lexicon, children, recognize high-frequency words than low-frequency words written by Peter Gordon (1989), entitled "Levels of Affixation in the Acquisition of English Morphology." This study has three untimed lexical-decision experiments which were carried out with 5- through 9-year-olds of native speakers of English and found general support for a systematic relation between productivity and level assignment. The aim of this paper is to make sure the readers would understand what the article's researcher try to explain about the word-formation such as stem, the stem which add affixes of Level 1, stem which adds affixes of Level 2, and stem which add aff.
See Full PDF See Full PDFSecond Language Research
In this article we focus on ‘false cognates’, lexical items that have overlapping orthographic/phonological properties but little or no semantic overlap. False-cognate pairs were created from French (second language or L2) and English (first language or L1) items by manipulating the levels of morphological correspondence between them. Our aim was to test whether mismatches in morphological structure affected success on a low-frequency backward lexical translation task. Fifty-eight participants, divided into four groups (A-level; degree level; adult learners; bilinguals) were tested on monomorphemic items (simplex), polymorphemic items (complex), items whose morphological structure in French exceeded that of their English counterpart (mismatch), and control items. Translation success rate followed a uniform pattern: control > mismatch > simplex > complex. With respect to the false-friend effect, participant responses were also uniform: complex > simplex > mismatch. It .
Download Free PDF View PDF
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Download Free PDF View PDF
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Download Free PDF View PDF
The article focuses on derived nouns, constructed on the basis of interdigitation of a consonantal root plus one of several dozen pro sodic templates or morphological patterns and/or by linear affixation to a word or stem. Structural characteristics of Hebrew nouns are outlined in terms of their inflectional properties (number and gender agreement and bound genitive case marking) followed by specification of different processes of noun-formation in terms of four major mor pho-lexical classes. Findings are then reviewed from psycholinguistic and usage-based studies on early and later language acquisition. Such research reveals: (I) children's early mastery of morphological structure as against a lengthy route to command of a mature conven tional lexicon; (II) a typological preference for relying on interdigited root plus pattern derivation compared with the seemingly more trans parently linear process of concatenation of stem plus external affix; (III) the difference in processing nouns constructed out of canonic triconsonantal roots compared with those based on defective biconso nantals; and (IV) the predominance of morphology over phonology in the mental lexicon of Hebrew speaker-writers. ,9.
Download Free PDF View PDF
Oxford Handbooks Online
Compound word formation is examined from the twin perspectives of comparative grammar and child language acquisition. Points of cross-linguistic variation addressed include the availability of bare-stem endocentric compounding as a “creative” process, head modifier order, the distribution of linking elements in Swedish and German compounds, the possibility of recursion, and the availability of synthetic compounding of the -ER (English dish washer) and bare-stem (French lave-vaisselle) types. Proposals discussed at length include Beard’s Generalization (which links head modifier order in compounds to the position of attributive adjectives), Snyder’s Compounding Parameter (linking syntactic availability of verb-particle constructions and adjectival resultatives to availability of creative endocentric compounding), and Gordon’s acquisitional studies of Kiparsky’s Generalization (concerning restrictions on regular plural-marking within compounds).
Download Free PDF View PDF
Brain and language
Download Free PDF View PDF
Across most languages, verbs produced by agrammatic aphasic individuals are frequently marked by syntactically and semantically inappropriate inflectional affixes, such as Last night, I walking home. As per language production models, verb inflection errors in English agrammatism could arise from three potential sources: encoding the verbs' morphology based on temporal information at the conceptual level, accessing syntactic well-formedness constraints of verbal morphology, and encoding morphophonological form. We investigate these aspects of encoding verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia. Using three sentence completion experiments, it was demonstrated that production of verb inflections was impaired whenever temporal reference was involved; while morphological complexity and syntactic constraints were less likely to be the source of verb inflection errors in agrammatism. These findings are discussed in relation to current language production models. Aphasia is an impairment in producing and/or comprehending language resulting from acute brain injury such as a cerebrovascular accident. Agrammatic speech is commonly associated with the clinical syndrome of Broca's aphasia, and is frequently characterized by ill-formed sentences, reduced syntactic complexity, a paucity of verbs, and grammatical morpheme errors. Production of both free grammatical morphemes and inflectional morphemes can be impaired in agrammatic aphasia. Across most languages that have been studied, verbs produced by agrammatic aphasic individuals are frequently marked by syntactically and semantically inappropriate inflectional affixes in a variety of tasks including spontaneous speech,
Download Free PDF View PDF
